Everything here is provisional. The limits are published before the conclusions, on purpose — a finding you cannot check is not a finding.
Do colleges and universities respond, at the program level, to state policy that funds education outside district-run schools? The unit of analysis is the education unit — the college, school or department of education at a degree-granting institution.
| Built for sector | Stated purpose is to prepare, credential, support or operate education outside district-run schools. |
| Names sector | Institutional text explicitly names private, classical, charter, academy or "non-traditional" settings — or a dedicated school-choice course exists. |
| Incidental | Reaches these educators only as a side effect, or is explicitly built around district partnership. |
| Nothing found | No offering identified. Absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. |
Engagement is treated as an observable institutional behaviour, not a virtue. Building a program for this sector and declining to build one are both coded observations. A reader who believes portable-funding policies harm public education can read the same rows as institutions declining appropriately; a reader who supports those policies can read them as institutions lagging. The categories are written to allow both readings. That is a design requirement, not a disclaimer.
When we are wrong, the correction runs on the front page and stays in the record permanently. We do not make silent edits.
An early draft of our baseline claimed that no one had systematically scanned colleges of education for choice-sector programs. That was wrong. EdChoice published exactly such a scan — Surfing the Pipeline by Michael Q. McShane, October 2023, with catalog research by Hanover Research across Florida, Arizona, Wisconsin and Vermont.
It is also the origin of a statistic our draft described as untraceable. It was traceable. Our baseline now builds on that work with attribution. The correction changes what is novel here: the first scan is not our contribution — the questions left unasked after it are.
If a row about your institution is wrong, incomplete, or out of date, we want to hear about it — particularly anything marked unverified. Corrections are published, not quietly absorbed. info@whenmoneyfollowsthechild.org